Posts vs. Pages

Home

CMS Needs:

“Why is it that nearly every open source CMS thinks they should look and act like a clone of Slashdot?”

Agreed. phpNuke, postNuke, phpWebSite — they all look the same. Most CMSs these days are concentrated on the blog-fueled phenomenon of the “post” being the most granular content unit. What about smaller sites that are not a collection of posts, but a collection of pages?

Deane | August 1, 2003

Skip to Comments

What Links Here

The following posts link to this post.
  • Coming Soon: Guided Content Maps
    I was reading a little e-book by Seth Godin the other day called "Everyone's an Expert" which turned out to…
    – October 28, 2005
  • Mambo Server
    Mambo Open Source: Mambo server is a PHP/MySQL-based content management system. The marketing material doesn't reveal much: "Mambo Open Source…
    – October 26, 2003

Comments

i totally agree with you…pages is what i need.

mike | August 18, 2003 9:20 PM

CityDesk is good for this. It will do both automated indices, blog style, or you can use it just like a WYSIWYG client with templating. A good compromise for most people.

Deane | August 18, 2003 9:53 PM

Webinsta could do the thing

Viesis | August 15, 2005 12:31 AM

Sorry, but what is kimerikas?

Jane.

sweeta-eo | March 27, 2008 3:22 AM

Add a Comment

Name:
URL:

Comment:
Markdown is enabled in comments. If you have to use HTML, we allow A HREF, B, BR, P, STRONG, EM, UL, LI, and BLOCKQUOTE.
 
Comments on this site are subject to our Terms of Service