Oracle confirms bid for bigger PeopleSoft | CNET News.com: Since PeopleSoft has swallowed J.D. Edwards, it’s become a little fatter for the feast. Consequently, Larry coughed up another billion.
“Oracle reaffirmed its bid to acquire PeopleSoft Thursday, following the successful completion of PeopleSoft’s offer for J.D. Edwards last week that adds nearly $1 billion to the value of the deal. Oracle’s $19.50-per-share bid, revalued to include J.D. Edwards, now stands at $7.25 billion instead of $6.3 billion, according to the regulatory filing.”
It’s worth saying that when this story broke, I thought it was just another egotistical Larry Ellison thing — something he did off the top of his head just for giggles, ego, and to shake up the competition. He’s something of a dashing playboy-type guy, and this would fit.
But more and more, it seems that he’s not kidding and he’s going to take PeopleSoft in whatever way he can. Money is on his side, time is on his side, and I believe the only thing that will stop the deal are the anti-trust considerations.
Follow Gadgetopia on Twitter
 
Tags:
Oracle, PeopleSoft, Larry Ellison
PeopleSoft gives in, accepts Oracle's $10.3B bid: I knew Larry would get what he wanted eventually. Ending 18 months of bad blood, Oracle is snapping up bitter rival PeopleSoft for $10.3 billion to create the world's second largest maker of business applications software. I wonder how long it will take before "Oracle"…
Oracle wins right to pursue rival: PeopleSoft may have played their last hand: Ellison and Henley wasted no time in firing off a letter to PeopleSoft's board, requesting a meeting to hammer out a deal, potentially the largest tech merger since Hewlett-Packard and Compaq Computer in 2002. We started covering this a…
PeopleSoft CEO: Oracle saga is over: The CEO of PeopleSoft is claiming that the Oracle bid is dead in the water. "As far as Conway is concerned, Oracle lost steam in July, after PeopleSoft sealed its $1.8 billion purchase of J.D Edwards. Oracle had initially wished to stop that deal, which…
That post I made about attribion got me thinking about the format and content of blog postings. The way I see it, there are basically three types of postings. Original Content, No Target This is where you actually write something yourself, and there's no "target" of the post — no thing…
I just remembered a joke that goes:
"What's the difference between God and Larry Ellison?"
"God doesn't think he's Larry Eillison."