The Formation of a Standard Reference, Re-Visited

Aug 13

The Formation of a Standard Reference, Re-Visited

About a year ago, I opined that Wikipedia was quickly becoming a “standard reference,” meaning it was a base repository of information about a subject — the starting point. This is reflected in how high Wikipedia rates when searching for notable people.

What I think this points to is the emergence of “super sites” — Web sites so popular and well-cited that they transcend “standard” search results and become the expected location for information about that person.

To test the theory back then, I searched for eight people, and listed how high in the ranks their Wikipedia page appeared. A year later, I thought I should do it again, and the results bear me out. In most cases, the Wikipedia page was markedly higher in the results than a year ago.

Back then, I also postulated that IMDb was going to be the same for entertainment personalities. Sadly, half of the people I checked where already 1st, so there’s not much to compare — they’re still first.

Will Amazon do the same for books? I looked over on my bookshelf, and Googled for the first few books I found:

In the three cases where the book wasn’t first, it was only behind the “official” site of the book, from the author or associated company. Interesting.


Comments

by Chris Wolz,   August 14, 2006 4:09 AM  

Enjoy the "standard of reference" assessment of Wikipedia - and which also seems to hold for its role on more current event topics (where I think the MSM falls short of providing context) such as: lebanon conflict 2nd

darfur 2nd

FYI - I've looked at Wikipedia participation by language - in particular German - at

http://influence.forumone.com/archives/74-de.wikipedia.org.html



Comments are Closed

Thanks to all who participated.

Want to advertise on this site? Contact FM.