No Pain, No Gain...

Mar 4

No Pain, No Gain...

I heard mention of this a while ago, one of the “non-lethal” weapons the U.S. military is working on:

THE US military is funding development of a weapon that delivers a bout of excruciating pain from up to 2 kilometres away. Intended for use against rioters, it is meant to leave victims unharmed.

Of course, not everyone thinks its a good idea:

“I am deeply concerned about the ethical aspects of this research,” says Andrew Rice, a consultant in pain medicine at Chelsea and Westminster Hospital in London. “Even if the use of temporary severe pain can be justified as a restraining measure, which I do not believe it can, the long-term physical and psychological effects are unknown.”

Amanda Williams, a clinical psychologist at University College London, fears that victims risk long-term harm. “Persistent pain can result from a range of supposedly non-destructive stimuli which nevertheless change the functioning of the nervous system,” she says. She is concerned that studies of cultured cells will fall short of demonstrating a safe level for a plasma burst. “They cannot tell us about the pain and psychological consequences of such a painful experience.”

What do you think?


Comments

by Uri,   March 5, 2005 2:32 AM  

I can't help but wonder - Why does the US spend so much on riot control when its greatest threats are small terrorist cells and new nuclear threats?


by Glenn,   March 6, 2005 5:40 AM  

Mr Rice may be right in his assesment of the situation (and I don't know either way), but, while the "long-term physical and psychological effects" about using pain as a weapon are unknown, the long-term physical and psychological effects of being shot in the head are fairly well documented.

If it's a choice between shooting them with this or a gun, I'd say the non-leathal would be better.

The only concern is that this weapon could be used as a croud suppressant unneeded, as because it is 'non-leathal' the would be less restrictions on using it.



Add Comment