<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0" 
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
    xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">

  <channel>
    <title>Gadgetopia: Blogging</title>
    <link>http://www.gadgetopia.com/Categories/Blogging.html</link>
    <description>This is a sub-feed of the main Gadgetopia RSS feed. This feed displays entries from the "Blogging" category.  The main Gadgetopia feed is available at http://www.gadgetopia.com/index.xml.</description>
    <dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
    <dc:creator>deane@deanebarker.net</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights>Copyright 2008</dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2008-06-02T08:10:58-06:00</dc:date>
    <admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.35" />
    <admin:errorReportsTo rdf:resource="mailto:deane@deanebarker.net"/>
    <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
    <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
    <sy:updateBase>2000-01-01T12:00+00:00</sy:updateBase>


    <item>
      <title>School of Thought</title>
      <link>http://gadgetopia.com/post/6412</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a title="School-of-Thought" href="http://www.school-of-thought.net/">School-of-Thought</a>: I&#8217;m unsubscribing from this blog today, but not because I don&#8217;t like it.  I love it, in fact, but not for the content, which is the problem.</p>

<p>This is a blog by Fred Deutsch, a school board member in Watertown, South Dakota.  <a href="http://blackmarks.net/">Corey</a> turned me on to it, and it&#8217;s one of the best education blogs I&#8217;ve seen.  I don&#8217;t seek these types of blogs out, but I&#8217;m really impressed in the depth of it, the technical prowess, and the guy&#8217;s obvious devotion to the craft of education.</p>

<p>However, the fact remains that this guy is way more into education than I am, and I&#8217;m quickly out of my depth.  I&#8217;m unsubscribing because, more often than not, Fred is talking about things I don&#8217;t understand and have only a tangential relationship to.</p>

<p>So why post about a blog I&#8217;m unsubscribing to?  Because I want a blog like this to succeed.  It&#8217;s good, and we need more like it.  So, if you&#8217;re an educator, or if you know one, please send them this link and encourage them to take a look.</p>
]]></description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6412@http://gadgetopia.com/</guid>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="School-of-Thought" href="http://www.school-of-thought.net/">School-of-Thought</a>: I&#8217;m unsubscribing from this blog today, but not because I don&#8217;t like it.  I love it, in fact, but not for the content, which is the problem.</p>

<p>This is a blog by Fred Deutsch, a school board member in Watertown, South Dakota.  <a href="http://blackmarks.net/">Corey</a> turned me on to it, and it&#8217;s one of the best education blogs I&#8217;ve seen.  I don&#8217;t seek these types of blogs out, but I&#8217;m really impressed in the depth of it, the technical prowess, and the guy&#8217;s obvious devotion to the craft of education.</p>

<p>However, the fact remains that this guy is way more into education than I am, and I&#8217;m quickly out of my depth.  I&#8217;m unsubscribing because, more often than not, Fred is talking about things I don&#8217;t understand and have only a tangential relationship to.</p>

<p>So why post about a blog I&#8217;m unsubscribing to?  Because I want a blog like this to succeed.  It&#8217;s good, and we need more like it.  So, if you&#8217;re an educator, or if you know one, please send them this link and encourage them to take a look.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:subject>Blogging</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2008-06-02T08:10:58-06:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Ebert on Blogs</title>
      <link>http://gadgetopia.com/post/6376</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a title="Roger Ebert's Journal: Fanzines beget blogs" href="http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/2008/05/fanzines_beget_blogs.html">Roger Ebert&#8217;s Journal: Fanzines beget blogs</a>: Roger Ebert has a blog now, which is crazy cool in and of itself.  This week he talks about how the old world of fanzines preceded the current crop of blogs and perhaps even the Web itself.</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>I have always been convinced that the culture of sf fanzines contributed heavily to the formative culture of the early Web, and generated models for web site and blogs. The very tone of the discourse is similar, and like fanzines, the Web took new word coinages, turned them into acronyms, and ran with them. Think about it. Science fiction fans in the decades before the internet were already interested in computers, big-time &#8212; first with the supercomputers of science fiction myth, and then with the earliest home-built models. Fans tended to be youngish, male, geeky, obsessed with popular culture, and compelled to circulate their ideas. In the reviews and criticism they ran, they slanted heavily toward expertise in narrow pop fields. </p>
</blockquote>

<p>Ebert rules.</p>

<p>(Roger Ebert emailed me, not once, but <em>twice.</em>  Have I mentioned that recently?  Seriously.  <em>Twice.</em>  Two friggin&#8217; emails.)</p>
]]></description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6376@http://gadgetopia.com/</guid>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="Roger Ebert's Journal: Fanzines beget blogs" href="http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/2008/05/fanzines_beget_blogs.html">Roger Ebert&#8217;s Journal: Fanzines beget blogs</a>: Roger Ebert has a blog now, which is crazy cool in and of itself.  This week he talks about how the old world of fanzines preceded the current crop of blogs and perhaps even the Web itself.</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>I have always been convinced that the culture of sf fanzines contributed heavily to the formative culture of the early Web, and generated models for web site and blogs. The very tone of the discourse is similar, and like fanzines, the Web took new word coinages, turned them into acronyms, and ran with them. Think about it. Science fiction fans in the decades before the internet were already interested in computers, big-time &#8212; first with the supercomputers of science fiction myth, and then with the earliest home-built models. Fans tended to be youngish, male, geeky, obsessed with popular culture, and compelled to circulate their ideas. In the reviews and criticism they ran, they slanted heavily toward expertise in narrow pop fields. </p>
</blockquote>

<p>Ebert rules.</p>

<p>(Roger Ebert emailed me, not once, but <em>twice.</em>  Have I mentioned that recently?  Seriously.  <em>Twice.</em>  Two friggin&#8217; emails.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:subject>Blogging</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2008-05-05T08:18:06-06:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>What Makes a Blog?</title>
      <link>http://gadgetopia.com/post/6373</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a title="Harvard Weblogs: What makes a weblog a weblog?" href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/whatmakesaweblogaweblog.html">Harvard Weblogs: What makes a weblog a weblog?</a>: This post is five years old, but it&#8217;s important and touches on a point I&#8217;ve always kind of wondered about &#8212; what makes a blog?  When do you have a blog as opposed to a regular Web site?</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>At Berkman we&#8217;re studying weblogs, how they&#8217;re used, and what they are. Rather than saying &#8220;I know it when I see it&#8221; I wanted to list all the known features of weblog software, but more important, get to the heart of what a weblog is, and how a weblog is different from a Wiki, or a news site managed with software like Vignette or Interwoven.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>There&#8217;s a lot of technical information about templates and calendars and such, but in my mind, the differences is in perspective and tone, and Winer hits it on the head right here:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>The personalities of the writers come through. That is the essential element of weblog writing, and almost all the other elements can be missing, and the rules can be violated, imho, as long as the voice of a person comes through, it&#8217;s a weblog.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>When people read a weblog, they&#8217;re getting the voice of an actual person, not some nameless, faceless organization.  That&#8217;s really the trick.</p>
]]></description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6373@http://gadgetopia.com/</guid>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="Harvard Weblogs: What makes a weblog a weblog?" href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/whatmakesaweblogaweblog.html">Harvard Weblogs: What makes a weblog a weblog?</a>: This post is five years old, but it&#8217;s important and touches on a point I&#8217;ve always kind of wondered about &#8212; what makes a blog?  When do you have a blog as opposed to a regular Web site?</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>At Berkman we&#8217;re studying weblogs, how they&#8217;re used, and what they are. Rather than saying &#8220;I know it when I see it&#8221; I wanted to list all the known features of weblog software, but more important, get to the heart of what a weblog is, and how a weblog is different from a Wiki, or a news site managed with software like Vignette or Interwoven.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>There&#8217;s a lot of technical information about templates and calendars and such, but in my mind, the differences is in perspective and tone, and Winer hits it on the head right here:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>The personalities of the writers come through. That is the essential element of weblog writing, and almost all the other elements can be missing, and the rules can be violated, imho, as long as the voice of a person comes through, it&#8217;s a weblog.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>When people read a weblog, they&#8217;re getting the voice of an actual person, not some nameless, faceless organization.  That&#8217;s really the trick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:subject>Blogging</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2008-05-01T15:31:53-06:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>FM Does Another Round of Financing</title>
      <link>http://gadgetopia.com/post/6362</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a title="Federated Media’s $50 Million C-Round Confirmed—No Plans to Buy Up Blog Partners" href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/15/federated-medias-50-million-c-round-confirmed%25e2%2580%2594no-plans-to-buy-up-blog-partners/">Federated Media’s $50 Million C-Round Confirmed &#8212; No Plans to Buy Up Blog Partners</a>: FM raised a bunch of new money, and this TechCrunch article has some good information about how they work behind-the-scenes.</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>After turning down a $100 million buyout offer, Federated Media Publishing has opted instead to raise $50 million in a C round led by Oak Investment Partners. As was reported two weeks ago, the rumored valuation is $200 million. While the company is not confirming that number, publisher Chas Edwards quips, “We have to be worth at least $101 million.”</p>
  
  <p>[&#8230;] In 2007, according to Edwards, Federated Media sold $22 million worth of ads across its network, up from $4 million in 2006. It generally splits the ad revenues with publishers, taking 40 percent for itself.</p>
</blockquote>
]]></description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6362@http://gadgetopia.com/</guid>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="Federated Media’s $50 Million C-Round Confirmed—No Plans to Buy Up Blog Partners" href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/15/federated-medias-50-million-c-round-confirmed%25e2%2580%2594no-plans-to-buy-up-blog-partners/">Federated Media’s $50 Million C-Round Confirmed &#8212; No Plans to Buy Up Blog Partners</a>: FM raised a bunch of new money, and this TechCrunch article has some good information about how they work behind-the-scenes.</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>After turning down a $100 million buyout offer, Federated Media Publishing has opted instead to raise $50 million in a C round led by Oak Investment Partners. As was reported two weeks ago, the rumored valuation is $200 million. While the company is not confirming that number, publisher Chas Edwards quips, “We have to be worth at least $101 million.”</p>
  
  <p>[&#8230;] In 2007, according to Edwards, Federated Media sold $22 million worth of ads across its network, up from $4 million in 2006. It generally splits the ad revenues with publishers, taking 40 percent for itself.</p>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:subject>Blogging</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2008-04-22T01:42:56-06:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Fail: The Freakonomics Blog RSS Feed</title>
      <link>http://gadgetopia.com/post/6355</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>I just unsubscribed from the <a href="http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/">Freakonomics blog</a> feed, and that bums me out.  <a href="http://gadgetopia.com/post/6316">I loved the book</a>, but the simple fact is that the feed sucked.</p>

<p>Two problems:</p>

<ol>
<li><p>Bad: They only put abbreviated parts of the feed in each post.  So you couldn&#8217;t read the whole thing in your feedreader, and kept having to click-through to the New York Times to read all the posts.</p></li>
<li><p>Worse: All they did for the excepts was take the first X words from the full post.  This sucks on its face, but it&#8217;s worsened by the writing style of the authors.  They tend to start off with something irrelevant, then work around to their point.  This means that all that was in the feed was something completely random that got cut off and gave me no indication if I wanted to click-through to read the rest of it.</p>

<p>If you&#8217;re going to abbreviate your feed and make people click through, <em>write explicit excerpts</em> that are designed to give your reader the information they need to decide whether or not to click-through.</p></li>
</ol>

<p>I&#8217;m sad because the blog didn&#8217;t live up to the book, largely for nothing but usability reasons.  Too bad.</p>
]]></description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6355@http://gadgetopia.com/</guid>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just unsubscribed from the <a href="http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/">Freakonomics blog</a> feed, and that bums me out.  <a href="http://gadgetopia.com/post/6316">I loved the book</a>, but the simple fact is that the feed sucked.</p>

<p>Two problems:</p>

<ol>
<li><p>Bad: They only put abbreviated parts of the feed in each post.  So you couldn&#8217;t read the whole thing in your feedreader, and kept having to click-through to the New York Times to read all the posts.</p></li>
<li><p>Worse: All they did for the excepts was take the first X words from the full post.  This sucks on its face, but it&#8217;s worsened by the writing style of the authors.  They tend to start off with something irrelevant, then work around to their point.  This means that all that was in the feed was something completely random that got cut off and gave me no indication if I wanted to click-through to read the rest of it.</p>

<p>If you&#8217;re going to abbreviate your feed and make people click through, <em>write explicit excerpts</em> that are designed to give your reader the information they need to decide whether or not to click-through.</p></li>
</ol>

<p>I&#8217;m sad because the blog didn&#8217;t live up to the book, largely for nothing but usability reasons.  Too bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:subject>Blogging</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2008-04-17T11:38:24-06:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>MT Action Streams</title>
      <link>http://gadgetopia.com/post/6292</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a title="Action Streams | Plugin Directory | movabletype.org" href="http://plugins.movabletype.org/action-streams/">Action Streams</a>: An interesting new plugin from Movable Type that will aggregate your actions from 75 different social networking services and publish them as a feed from your MT install.</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>The Action Streams plugin is an amazing new plugin for Movable Type 4.1 that lets you aggregate, control, and share your actions around the web as well as a list of your profiles on various services. With the Action Streams plugin you keep control over the record of your actions on the web. And of course, you also have full control over showing and hiding each of your actions. The Action Streams plugin, by default, also publishes your stream using Atom and the Microformat hAtom so that your actions aren&#8217;t trapped in any one service.</p>
</blockquote>
]]></description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6292@http://gadgetopia.com/</guid>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="Action Streams | Plugin Directory | movabletype.org" href="http://plugins.movabletype.org/action-streams/">Action Streams</a>: An interesting new plugin from Movable Type that will aggregate your actions from 75 different social networking services and publish them as a feed from your MT install.</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>The Action Streams plugin is an amazing new plugin for Movable Type 4.1 that lets you aggregate, control, and share your actions around the web as well as a list of your profiles on various services. With the Action Streams plugin you keep control over the record of your actions on the web. And of course, you also have full control over showing and hiding each of your actions. The Action Streams plugin, by default, also publishes your stream using Atom and the Microformat hAtom so that your actions aren&#8217;t trapped in any one service.</p>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:subject>Blogging</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2008-02-27T09:35:58-06:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>A Recursive Look at Audio Posting</title>
      <link>http://gadgetopia.com/post/6291</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><!-- FM Mobile Post Top Icon --></p>

<script type="text/javascript" src="http://mobileposts.federatedmedia.net/top_icon.js"></script>

<p><!-- /FM Mobile Post Top Icon --></p>

<p>(<b>Note:</b> If you&#8217;re reading this in RSS, it refers to an audio widget only available on the HTML side.  Click the post title to go to the page which contains the widget.)</p>

<p>Okay, here&#8217;s the first one.  I hope it goes well.  (And I&#8217;m purposely not calling this a &#8220;podcast,&#8221; because I have no idea just how to get this into RSS.  Maybe with the next one&#8230;)</p>

<p>Comments are open.  Be gentle.  (I&#8217;ve already been notified by Karla that some of my complaints have been addressed already in various podcasting platforms, so it&#8217;s just more evidence of how much of a noob I am&#8230;)</p>

<p><!-- FM Mobile Post Widget --></p>

<script type="text/javascript" src="http://mobileposts.federatedmedia.net/gadgetopia/192/mobile_post.js"></script>

<p><!-- /FM Mobile Post Widget --></p>
]]></description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6291@http://gadgetopia.com/</guid>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- FM Mobile Post Top Icon --></p>

<script type="text/javascript" src="http://mobileposts.federatedmedia.net/top_icon.js"></script>

<p><!-- /FM Mobile Post Top Icon --></p>

<p>(<b>Note:</b> If you&#8217;re reading this in RSS, it refers to an audio widget only available on the HTML side.  Click the post title to go to the page which contains the widget.)</p>

<p>Okay, here&#8217;s the first one.  I hope it goes well.  (And I&#8217;m purposely not calling this a &#8220;podcast,&#8221; because I have no idea just how to get this into RSS.  Maybe with the next one&#8230;)</p>

<p>Comments are open.  Be gentle.  (I&#8217;ve already been notified by Karla that some of my complaints have been addressed already in various podcasting platforms, so it&#8217;s just more evidence of how much of a noob I am&#8230;)</p>

<p><!-- FM Mobile Post Widget --></p>

<script type="text/javascript" src="http://mobileposts.federatedmedia.net/gadgetopia/192/mobile_post.js"></script>

<p><!-- /FM Mobile Post Widget --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:subject>Blogging</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2008-02-25T23:47:09-06:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Blogging From Beyond the Grave</title>
      <link>http://gadgetopia.com/post/6238</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a title="Obsidian Wings: Andy Olmsted" href="http://obsidianwings.blogs.com/obsidian_wings/2008/01/andy-olmsted.html">Andy Olmsted</a>: A blogger in Iraq left a pre-written post with a friend in the event he died.  He did.</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>This is an entry I would have preferred not to have published, but there are limits to what we can control in life, and apparently I have passed one of those limits.</p>
</blockquote>
]]></description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6238@http://gadgetopia.com/</guid>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="Obsidian Wings: Andy Olmsted" href="http://obsidianwings.blogs.com/obsidian_wings/2008/01/andy-olmsted.html">Andy Olmsted</a>: A blogger in Iraq left a pre-written post with a friend in the event he died.  He did.</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>This is an entry I would have preferred not to have published, but there are limits to what we can control in life, and apparently I have passed one of those limits.</p>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:subject>Blogging</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2008-01-05T01:48:25-06:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>The Holiday Gadget Guide</title>
      <link>http://gadgetopia.com/post/6158</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>I promise I don&#8217;t have a cleaning fetish, but, still, my first two posts to FM&#8217;s annual <a href="http://holidaygadgetguide.federatedmedia.net/">Holiday Gadget Guide</a> have been about vacuums:</p>

<ul>
<li><a href="http://holidaygadgetguide.federatedmedia.net/90">The Dyson DCO7</a></li>
<li><a href="http://holidaygadgetguide.federatedmedia.net/112">My Roomba</a></li>
</ul>

<p>Even if you don&#8217;t like house-cleaning, they&#8217;re both pretty interesting.</p>

<p>Disclaimer: FM sells the advertising on Gadgetopia, and <a href="http://blendinteractive.com">Blend</a> designed and implemented the Holiday Gadget Guide site.</p>
]]></description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6158@http://gadgetopia.com/</guid>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I promise I don&#8217;t have a cleaning fetish, but, still, my first two posts to FM&#8217;s annual <a href="http://holidaygadgetguide.federatedmedia.net/">Holiday Gadget Guide</a> have been about vacuums:</p>

<ul>
<li><a href="http://holidaygadgetguide.federatedmedia.net/90">The Dyson DCO7</a></li>
<li><a href="http://holidaygadgetguide.federatedmedia.net/112">My Roomba</a></li>
</ul>

<p>Even if you don&#8217;t like house-cleaning, they&#8217;re both pretty interesting.</p>

<p>Disclaimer: FM sells the advertising on Gadgetopia, and <a href="http://blendinteractive.com">Blend</a> designed and implemented the Holiday Gadget Guide site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:subject>Blogging</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2007-11-08T08:45:52-06:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Blogging Scholarship</title>
      <link>http://gadgetopia.com/post/6087</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a title="The Blogging Scholarship" href="http://www.collegescholarships.org/our-scholarships/blogging.htm">The Blogging Scholarship</a>: This is admirable.</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>Is Your Blog Worthy of a $10,000 Scholarship? [&#8230;] Do you maintain a weblog and attend college? Would you like $10,000 to help pay for books, tuition, or other living costs? If so, read on.</p>
  
  <p>We&#8217;re giving away $10,000 this year to a college student who blogs.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>But how do they define blog?  In some cases, the differences between &#8220;blog&#8221; and &#8220;site&#8221; are not clear.</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>Your blog must contain unique and interesting information about you and/or things you are passionate about. No spam bloggers please!!!</p>
</blockquote>
]]></description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6087@http://gadgetopia.com/</guid>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="The Blogging Scholarship" href="http://www.collegescholarships.org/our-scholarships/blogging.htm">The Blogging Scholarship</a>: This is admirable.</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>Is Your Blog Worthy of a $10,000 Scholarship? [&#8230;] Do you maintain a weblog and attend college? Would you like $10,000 to help pay for books, tuition, or other living costs? If so, read on.</p>
  
  <p>We&#8217;re giving away $10,000 this year to a college student who blogs.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>But how do they define blog?  In some cases, the differences between &#8220;blog&#8221; and &#8220;site&#8221; are not clear.</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>Your blog must contain unique and interesting information about you and/or things you are passionate about. No spam bloggers please!!!</p>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:subject>Blogging</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2007-09-28T14:09:44-06:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Proof of Purchase</title>
      <link>http://gadgetopia.com/post/6081</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a title="proof of purchase" href="http://www.proofpurchase.com/">proof of purchase</a>: An interesting blog written entirely on scanned receipts of purchases this guy has made.</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>i am a middle class 20 year old with hopes, dreams, fears, and a visa check-card</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Reminds me a little of <a href="http://www.postsecret.com/">PostSecret</a>.</p>
]]></description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6081@http://gadgetopia.com/</guid>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="proof of purchase" href="http://www.proofpurchase.com/">proof of purchase</a>: An interesting blog written entirely on scanned receipts of purchases this guy has made.</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>i am a middle class 20 year old with hopes, dreams, fears, and a visa check-card</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Reminds me a little of <a href="http://www.postsecret.com/">PostSecret</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:subject>Blogging</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2007-09-24T11:15:58-06:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>The &quot;Next&quot; Bookmark in Google Reader</title>
      <link>http://gadgetopia.com/post/5985</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve recently switched to <a href="http://www.google.com/reader">Google Reader</a> from <a href="http://www.bloglines.com/">Bloglines</a>.  There&#8217;s a lot of nice functionality, but here&#8217;s something I think is really neat: the &#8220;Next&#8221; bookmark.</p>

<p>This is a bookmark I have in my sidebar.  When I click it, I get the permalink of the next item in my feeds. So, if I click it now, it might take to to a <a href="http://www.metafilter.org/">Metafilter</a> post, or a Gadgetopia comment, or whatever the next item in my list of feeds is.</p>

<p>The thing is, it doesn&#8217;t take me to that item in Google Reader.  It pushes me to the permalink URL of that item, so I get the <em>actual page</em> of the post at MetaFilter or the actual comment at Gadgetopia.  (Funny how I felt the need to italicize &#8220;actual page.&#8221;  As if that&#8217;s so odd now.)</p>

<p>I don&#8217;t know I like this so much &#8212; it&#8217;s just neat.  You can just hit this bookmark, and you&#8217;ll get whisked to a page that is probably something you&#8217;re interested in.  It&#8217;s like a contiuous &#8220;I&#8217;m feeling lucky&#8221; button.</p>

<p>And you just keep hitting it until you get this.</p>

<p><center><img src="http://www.gadgetopia.com/images/google_reader_end.jpg"></center></p>

<p>Seriously. That&#8217;s what you get when you don&#8217;t have anything unread left in your feed.  Clicking the bookmark on that page takes you <a href="http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm">here</a>.</p>
]]></description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5985@http://gadgetopia.com/</guid>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve recently switched to <a href="http://www.google.com/reader">Google Reader</a> from <a href="http://www.bloglines.com/">Bloglines</a>.  There&#8217;s a lot of nice functionality, but here&#8217;s something I think is really neat: the &#8220;Next&#8221; bookmark.</p>

<p>This is a bookmark I have in my sidebar.  When I click it, I get the permalink of the next item in my feeds. So, if I click it now, it might take to to a <a href="http://www.metafilter.org/">Metafilter</a> post, or a Gadgetopia comment, or whatever the next item in my list of feeds is.</p>

<p>The thing is, it doesn&#8217;t take me to that item in Google Reader.  It pushes me to the permalink URL of that item, so I get the <em>actual page</em> of the post at MetaFilter or the actual comment at Gadgetopia.  (Funny how I felt the need to italicize &#8220;actual page.&#8221;  As if that&#8217;s so odd now.)</p>

<p>I don&#8217;t know I like this so much &#8212; it&#8217;s just neat.  You can just hit this bookmark, and you&#8217;ll get whisked to a page that is probably something you&#8217;re interested in.  It&#8217;s like a contiuous &#8220;I&#8217;m feeling lucky&#8221; button.</p>

<p>And you just keep hitting it until you get this.</p>

<p><center><img src="http://www.gadgetopia.com/images/google_reader_end.jpg"></center></p>

<p>Seriously. That&#8217;s what you get when you don&#8217;t have anything unread left in your feed.  Clicking the bookmark on that page takes you <a href="http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:subject>Blogging</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2007-07-21T14:29:18-06:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Best List of Blog Cliches.  Evar.</title>
      <link>http://gadgetopia.com/post/5980</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a title="Bad Lingo: Blog-Media Clich s - Gawker" href="http://www.gawker.com/news/blogs/bad-lingo-blogmedia-clichs-222162.php">Bad Lingo: Blog-Media Cliches</a>: We are guilty of so many of these, yo.</p>

<ul>
<li>Best. [ultimate thing or experience.] Ever/Evar.</li>
<li>[undesirable counter-example], not so much.</li>
<li>[Argument], wait for it, [rhetorical flourish].</li>
<li>etc.</li>
</ul>
]]></description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5980@http://gadgetopia.com/</guid>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="Bad Lingo: Blog-Media Clich s - Gawker" href="http://www.gawker.com/news/blogs/bad-lingo-blogmedia-clichs-222162.php">Bad Lingo: Blog-Media Cliches</a>: We are guilty of so many of these, yo.</p>

<ul>
<li>Best. [ultimate thing or experience.] Ever/Evar.</li>
<li>[undesirable counter-example], not so much.</li>
<li>[Argument], wait for it, [rhetorical flourish].</li>
<li>etc.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:subject>Blogging</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2007-07-19T04:42:43-06:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>How Much They Make</title>
      <link>http://gadgetopia.com/post/5979</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a title="How Top Bloggers Earn Money" href="http://images.businessweek.com/ss/07/07/0714_bloggers/index.htm">How Top Bloggers Earn Money</a>: Here&#8217;s what a lot of people have been waiting for: how much money the top bloggers in the world are making.</p>

<p>Answer: <em>a lot</em>.  Way more than me, that&#8217;s for sure.  Some of the numbers are just nuts.  Good for them.</p>
]]></description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5979@http://gadgetopia.com/</guid>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="How Top Bloggers Earn Money" href="http://images.businessweek.com/ss/07/07/0714_bloggers/index.htm">How Top Bloggers Earn Money</a>: Here&#8217;s what a lot of people have been waiting for: how much money the top bloggers in the world are making.</p>

<p>Answer: <em>a lot</em>.  Way more than me, that&#8217;s for sure.  Some of the numbers are just nuts.  Good for them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:subject>Blogging</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2007-07-18T13:30:49-06:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>NCAA Silences Blogging Reporter</title>
      <link>http://gadgetopia.com/post/5924</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a title="NCAA criticized for ejecting reporter who blogged at game - USATODAY.com" href="http://www.usatoday.com/sports/college/2007-06-12-ncaa-criticized_N.htm">NCAA criticized for ejecting reporter who blogged at game</a>: Before you go and do something like this, you really have to ask yourself, &#8220;Am I firing the first shot in a war I can&#8217;t win?&#8221;</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>Media groups blasted the NCAA yesterday for ejecting a Courier-Journal reporter from the press box at Sunday&#8217;s University of Louisville super-regional baseball game after he posted live updates on the newspaper&#8217;s website.</p>
  
  <p>&#8220;This is appalling, but in no way am I surprised,&#8221; said Lucy Dagleish, executive director of the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press. &#8220;The television networks pay a lot of money for the rights to live reporting, and the NCAA makes a whale of a lot of money. This is all about money and not about the First Amendment.&#8221;</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Reminds me of the <a href="http://www.gadgetopia.com/post/5868">Digg revolt</a> that happened last month.  People, people &#8212; make sure your fight is one you stand at least a small chance of winning.</p>

<p>If it&#8217;s obvious that you&#8217;re going to lose, perhaps you should look further down the road and figure out how you can adapt and thrive in the the new reality.  As an example, I give you the TV show &#8220;American Heiress,&#8221; which <a href="http://www.gadgetopia.com/post/5905">I blogged about</a> a few weeks ago.</p>
]]></description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5924@http://gadgetopia.com/</guid>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="NCAA criticized for ejecting reporter who blogged at game - USATODAY.com" href="http://www.usatoday.com/sports/college/2007-06-12-ncaa-criticized_N.htm">NCAA criticized for ejecting reporter who blogged at game</a>: Before you go and do something like this, you really have to ask yourself, &#8220;Am I firing the first shot in a war I can&#8217;t win?&#8221;</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>Media groups blasted the NCAA yesterday for ejecting a Courier-Journal reporter from the press box at Sunday&#8217;s University of Louisville super-regional baseball game after he posted live updates on the newspaper&#8217;s website.</p>
  
  <p>&#8220;This is appalling, but in no way am I surprised,&#8221; said Lucy Dagleish, executive director of the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press. &#8220;The television networks pay a lot of money for the rights to live reporting, and the NCAA makes a whale of a lot of money. This is all about money and not about the First Amendment.&#8221;</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Reminds me of the <a href="http://www.gadgetopia.com/post/5868">Digg revolt</a> that happened last month.  People, people &#8212; make sure your fight is one you stand at least a small chance of winning.</p>

<p>If it&#8217;s obvious that you&#8217;re going to lose, perhaps you should look further down the road and figure out how you can adapt and thrive in the the new reality.  As an example, I give you the TV show &#8220;American Heiress,&#8221; which <a href="http://www.gadgetopia.com/post/5905">I blogged about</a> a few weeks ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:subject>Blogging</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2007-06-14T08:55:47-06:00</dc:date>
    </item>


  </channel>
</rss>